Compare performance (228 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (36,500 $ vs 25,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Buick Envision or Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,000 $ , while the Buick Envision costs 36,500 $ . That’s a price difference of around 11,550 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback performs a bit better – achieving 27 mpg, compared to 22 mpg for the Buick Envision. That’s a difference of about 5 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Buick Envision offers very slightly more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback delivers a bit more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 258 lb-ft. That’s about 52 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is noticeably lighter – 3,086 lbs compared to 3,940 lbs. The difference is around 854 lbs.
The Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Buick Envision is a midsize SUV that blends a refined aesthetic with a focus on comfort and practicality. Its design combines sleek curves and an assertive front grille, projecting both sophistication and sportiness. Inside, the Envision offers a quiet and comfortable cabin, equipped with the latest in technology and convenience features to enhance the driving experience.
details
The Mazda3 Hatchback is known for its combination of stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, making it a popular choice among compact car enthusiasts. Its sleek exterior, coupled with a high-quality interior, provides both aesthetic appeal and comfort for drivers and passengers alike. The responsive handling and smooth ride ensure an enjoyable driving experience, whether navigating urban streets or cruising on the highway.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,500 - 46,200 $
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
22 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 27 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
31 - 36 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
16.1 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 - 13.2 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback, i-ACTIV AWD Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,940 - 4,085 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,086 - 3,397 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
182.7 in.
|
Length
175.6 in.
|
|
Width
74.1 in.
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
|
Height
64 in.
|
Height
56 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
258 lb-ft
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
-
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Buick
|
Brand
Mazda
|