Compare performance (500 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (31,900 $ vs 25,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Ford Mustang or Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,000 $ , while the Ford Mustang costs 31,900 $ . That’s a price difference of around 6,970 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback performs clearly better – achieving 27 mpg, compared to 21 mpg for the Ford Mustang. That’s a difference of about 6 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang offers clearly more power – delivering 500 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 273 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang delivers visibly more torque with 418 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 108 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is moderately lighter – 3,086 lbs compared to 3,579 lbs. The difference is around 493 lbs.
The Ford Mustang comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Mustang is an iconic American muscle car known for its powerful performance and sleek design. Since its debut in the mid-1960s, the Mustang has captured the hearts of car enthusiasts with its combination of bold styling and thrilling driving dynamics. With its enduring presence on the roads, this legendary vehicle continues to embody the spirit of freedom and adventure.
detailsThe Mazda3 Hatchback is known for its combination of stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, making it a popular choice among compact car enthusiasts. Its sleek exterior, coupled with a high-quality interior, provides both aesthetic appeal and comfort for drivers and passengers alike. The responsive handling and smooth ride ensure an enjoyable driving experience, whether navigating urban streets or cruising on the highway.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,900 - 63,100 $
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
14 - 21 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 27 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
22 - 32 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
31 - 36 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
16 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 - 13.2 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback, Convertible
|
Body Type
Hatchback, i-ACTIV AWD Hatchback
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,579 - 3,933 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,086 - 3,397 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
10.3 - 13.3 cu. ft.
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
189.4 - 189.7 in.
|
Length
175.6 in.
|
|
Width
75.4 - 76.1 in.
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
|
Height
54 - 55 in.
|
Height
56 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic,
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
315 - 500 HP
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
350 - 418 lb-ft
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|