Compare performance (204 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (33,700 $ vs 25,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Honda Accord Hybrid or Mazda CX-30?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,000 $ , while the Honda Accord Hybrid costs 33,700 $ . That’s a price difference of around 8,660 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Honda Accord Hybrid performs significantly better – achieving 51 mpg, compared to 26 mpg for the Mazda CX-30. That’s a difference of about 25 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers considerably more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 134 lb-ft. That’s about 176 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is only slightly lighter – 3,419 lbs compared to 3,468 lbs. The difference is around 49 lbs.
The Mazda CX-30 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda Accord Hybrid combines the elegance and practicality of a midsize sedan with impressive fuel efficiency, making it a standout in its class. With its sophisticated design, the Accord Hybrid offers a comfortable and quiet ride, enhanced by modern interior features and innovative technology. Its environmentally friendly performance doesn't compromise on power, providing a dynamic yet smooth driving experience that appeals to eco-conscious drivers.
details
The Mazda CX-30 brings big-car polish to a compact footprint, with taut handling and a cabin that feels a cut above most rivals. It’s not the boxiest hauler, but if you like crisp steering, tasteful design, and a dash of driver fun, this crossover makes the daily commute feel a little special.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,700 - 39,300 $
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
46 - 51 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
22 - 26 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
41 - 44 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
30 - 33 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.8 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,468 - 3,532 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,419 - 3,527 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
16.7 cu. ft.
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
195.7 in.
|
Length
173 in.
|
|
Width
73.3 in.
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
|
Height
57 in.
|
Height
61 - 62 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
134 lb-ft
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|