Compare performance (147 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (20,500 $ vs 30,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Kia Soul or Mazda CX-50?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Kia Soul is substantially cheaper – starting at 20,500 $ , while the Mazda CX-50 costs 30,300 $ . That’s a price difference of around 9,810 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Kia Soul performs slightly better – achieving 29 mpg, compared to 25 mpg for the Mazda CX-50. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-50 offers clearly more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 147 HP. That’s roughly 80 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-50 delivers significantly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 132 lb-ft. That’s about 178 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Soul is clearly lighter – 2,888 lbs compared to 3,741 lbs. The difference is around 853 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Soul pairs quirky-cool styling with a surprisingly airy cabin, making city commutes easy and weekend hauls more practical than you’d expect. It isn’t pretending to be an off-road bruiser, but with clever interior space, user-friendly tech, and a cheerful demeanor, it’s a smart pick for drivers who value personality and everyday convenience.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,500 - 24,800 $
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
27 - 29 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
33 - 35 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
14.3 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,888 - 2,998 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
165.2 in.
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
|
Width
70.9 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
63 in.
|
Height
63 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
147 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
132 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|