Compare performance (394 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (61,500 $ vs 28,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Land Rover Range Rover Velar or Mazda CX-5?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,800 $ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61,500 $ . That’s a price difference of around 32,730 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-5 performs a bit better – achieving 26 mpg, compared to 22 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers clearly more power – delivering 394 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 167 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers markedly more torque with 406 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 96 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 3,679 lbs compared to 4,130 lbs. The difference is around 451 lbs.
The Mazda CX-5 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a statement of modern luxury and progressive sophistication in the SUV segment. With its sleek design and refined aesthetics, the Velar seamlessly merges innovative technology with a sense of timeless elegance. Inside, it offers a sanctuary of comfort and cutting-edge infotainment, making every journey an opulent experience.
detailsThe Mazda CX-5 is the crossover for drivers who still like to drive, with a cabin that feels a class above and steering that actually talks back. It’s not the biggest or flashiest in the segment, but it nails the everyday sweet spot with smart tech, tidy looks, and just enough zoom-zoom to make the school run feel like a sneaky detour.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
61,500 - 78,400 $
|
Price
28,800 - 40,800 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
19 - 22 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
22 - 26 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
15 - 26 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
27 - 30 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
21.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,130 - 4,430 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,679 - 3,871 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
188.9 in.
|
Length
180.1 in.
|
|
Width
80.4 in.
|
Width
72.6 in.
|
|
Height
66 in.
|
Height
66 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline,
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
247 - 394 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
269 - 406 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2 - 3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Mazda
|