Compare performance (340 HP vs 180 HP), trunk space and price (40,400 $ vs 30,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-70 or Subaru Forester?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Subaru Forester is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 $ , while the Mazda CX-70 costs 40,400 $ . That’s a price difference of around 10,450 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Subaru Forester performs slightly better – achieving 26 mpg, compared to 23 mpg for the Mazda CX-70. That’s a difference of about 3 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-70 offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 160 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-70 delivers considerably more torque with 369 lb-ft compared to 178 lb-ft. That’s about 191 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Subaru Forester is visibly lighter – 3,510 lbs compared to 4,863 lbs. The difference is around 1,353 lbs.
The Mazda CX-70 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-70 presents itself as a sleek and dynamic addition to the crossover segment, blending sophisticated design with practical versatility. Its spacious interior and refined materials elevate the driving experience, making it a strong contender for those seeking both style and comfort. With Mazda's commitment to performance and innovation, the CX-70 promises agility and responsive handling on every journey.
detailsThe Subaru Forester is the outdoorsy family SUV that shrugs off muddy trails and bad weather as easily as it handles school runs. With airy visibility, a practical cabin, and unflappable all-wheel-drive confidence, it delivers no-drama comfort during the week and genuine adventure vibes on the weekend without trying too hard.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,400 - 56,000 $
|
Price
30,000 - 40,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
25 - 26 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
32 - 33 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 - 19.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
16.6 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,863 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,510 - 3,664 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
200.8 in.
|
Length
183.3 in.
|
|
Width
77.6 in.
|
Width
72 in.
|
|
Height
68 in.
|
Height
68 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
280 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
180 HP
|
|
Torque
332 - 369 lb-ft
|
Torque
178 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Subaru
|