Compare performance (340 HP vs 270 HP), trunk space and price (40,400 $ vs 40,700 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-70 or Toyota 4Runner?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-70 is marginally cheaper – starting at 40,400 $ , while the Toyota 4Runner costs 40,700 $ . That’s a price difference of around 260 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-70 performs visibly better – achieving 23 mpg, compared to 16 mpg for the Toyota 4Runner. That’s a difference of about 7 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-70 offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 270 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-70 delivers visibly more torque with 369 lb-ft compared to 278 lb-ft. That’s about 91 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota 4Runner is somewhat lighter – 4,400 lbs compared to 4,863 lbs. The difference is around 463 lbs.
The Mazda CX-70 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-70 presents itself as a sleek and dynamic addition to the crossover segment, blending sophisticated design with practical versatility. Its spacious interior and refined materials elevate the driving experience, making it a strong contender for those seeking both style and comfort. With Mazda's commitment to performance and innovation, the CX-70 promises agility and responsive handling on every journey.
detailsThe Toyota 4Runner is an old-school SUV that still loves dirt trails more than valet lines, with a tough-as-nails vibe and a cabin built for adventures with dogs, gear, and muddy boots. It’s not the last word in on-road polish, but if you want something that feels honest, dependable, and ready to shrug off the daily grind, this rugged icon is your faithful companion.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,400 - 56,000 $
|
Price
40,700 - 55,200 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
19 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 - 19.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
23 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,863 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,400 - 4,805 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
200.8 in.
|
Length
190.2 - 191.3 in.
|
|
Width
77.6 in.
|
Width
75.8 in.
|
|
Height
68 in.
|
Height
71 - 72 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
280 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
270 HP
|
|
Torque
332 - 369 lb-ft
|
Torque
278 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.3 L
|
Engine Displacement
4 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|