Compare performance (340 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (37,800 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-90 or Ford Ranger?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Ranger is slightly cheaper – starting at 32,800 $ , while the Mazda CX-90 costs 37,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 5,025 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-90 performs slightly better – achieving 24 mpg, compared to 21 mpg for the Ford Ranger. That’s a difference of about 3 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers a bit more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers moderately more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 369 lb-ft. That’s about 61 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-90 offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Ranger is a bit lighter – 4,203 lbs compared to 4,735 lbs. The difference is around 532 lbs.
The Mazda CX-90 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-90 brings sports-sedan swagger to the family SUV crowd, pairing a poised chassis with a hushed, upscale cabin that feels genuinely premium. It’s roomy, refined, and surprisingly fun to steer, making it a savvy alternative to the usual luxury suspects—just know the ride leans firm in exchange for that grin-inducing composure.
details
The Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,800 - 56,500 $
|
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 24 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 - 19.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
Body Type
SuperCrew
|
|
Seats
6 - 8
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,735 - 4,901 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
201.6 in.
|
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
|
|
Width
77.6 in.
|
Width
79 in.
|
|
Height
68 in.
|
Height
73 - 75 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
280 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
|
|
Torque
332 - 369 lb-ft
|
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|