Compare performance (340 HP vs 310 HP), trunk space and price (37,800 $ vs 32,100 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-90 or Nissan Frontier?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Frontier is moderately cheaper – starting at 32,100 $ , while the Mazda CX-90 costs 37,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 5,795 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-90 performs clearly better – achieving 24 mpg, compared to 18 mpg for the Nissan Frontier. That’s a difference of about 6 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-90 offers only slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 310 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-90 delivers markedly more torque with 369 lb-ft compared to 281 lb-ft. That’s about 88 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-90 offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
The Mazda CX-90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-90 brings sports-sedan swagger to the family SUV crowd, pairing a poised chassis with a hushed, upscale cabin that feels genuinely premium. It’s roomy, refined, and surprisingly fun to steer, making it a savvy alternative to the usual luxury suspects—just know the ride leans firm in exchange for that grin-inducing composure.
details
The Nissan Frontier is the no-nonsense midsize pickup that doubles as a weekday workhorse and a weekend adventure buddy, with just enough modern polish to keep your commute civilized. Against glossier rivals, it wins you over with straightforward capability, tough-guy charm, and the kind of dependability that doesn’t need to shout about it.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,800 - 56,500 $
|
Price
32,100 - 45,600 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 24 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
18 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
22 - 24 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 - 19.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
21.1 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
Body Type
King Cab, Pickup
|
|
Seats
6 - 8
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,735 - 4,901 lbs
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
201.6 in.
|
Length
210.2 - 224.1 in.
|
|
Width
77.6 in.
|
Width
73 - 74.7 in.
|
|
Height
68 in.
|
Height
71 - 72 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
280 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
310 HP
|
|
Torque
332 - 369 lb-ft
|
Torque
281 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.3 L
|
Engine Displacement
3.8 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|