Compare performance (227 HP vs 265 HP), trunk space and price (25,000 $ vs 39,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback or Toyota Highlander?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,000 $ , while the Toyota Highlander costs 39,300 $ . That’s a price difference of around 14,320 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Toyota Highlander performs noticeably better – achieving 36 mpg, compared to 27 mpg for the Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback. That’s a difference of about 9 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Highlander offers moderately more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.
Both models offer the same torque – 310 lb-ft.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Toyota Highlander offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda Mazda3 Hatchback is noticeably lighter – 3,086 lbs compared to 4,155 lbs. The difference is around 1,069 lbs.
The Toyota Highlander has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda3 Hatchback is known for its combination of stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, making it a popular choice among compact car enthusiasts. Its sleek exterior, coupled with a high-quality interior, provides both aesthetic appeal and comfort for drivers and passengers alike. The responsive handling and smooth ride ensure an enjoyable driving experience, whether navigating urban streets or cruising on the highway.
detailsThe Toyota Highlander is a trusty family hauler that blends calm road manners with a thoughtfully finished cabin and a bonus row for occasional adults. It won’t set your hair on fire, but with a refined hybrid option, easy-to-use tech, and resale strength that makes rivals sweat, it’s the sensible choice that still feels a bit special.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
Price
39,300 - 53,400 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 27 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
21 - 36 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
31 - 36 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 - 35 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 - 13.2 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
17.1 - 17.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback, i-ACTIV AWD Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7 - 8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,086 - 3,397 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,155 - 4,595 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
175.6 in.
|
Length
194.9 - 197.4 in.
|
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
Width
76 in.
|
|
Height
56 in.
|
Height
68 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline, Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel, All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
243 - 265 HP
|
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
175 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.4 - 2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|