Compare performance (227 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (24,000 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda Mazda3 Sedan or Ford Ranger?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda Mazda3 Sedan is visibly cheaper – starting at 24,000 $ , while the Ford Ranger costs 32,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 8,870 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda Mazda3 Sedan performs clearly better – achieving 27 mpg, compared to 21 mpg for the Ford Ranger. That’s a difference of about 6 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 178 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers visibly more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 120 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda Mazda3 Sedan is visibly lighter – 3,124 lbs compared to 4,203 lbs. The difference is around 1,079 lbs.
The Mazda Mazda3 Sedan is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda3 Sedan exudes elegance and sophistication, setting a benchmark in its class with stylish design and refined engineering. Its interior seamlessly combines comfort and advanced technology, providing a serene driving experience that captivates both drivers and passengers alike. With agile handling and a spirited personality, the Mazda3 Sedan is as much about enjoying the journey as it is about reaching the destination.
detailsThe Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,000 - 35,800 $
|
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 27 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
32 - 37 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 - 13.2 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sedan, Sedan
|
Body Type
SuperCrew
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,124 - 3,395 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
13.2 cu. ft.
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
183.5 in.
|
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
|
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
Width
79 in.
|
|
Height
56 in.
|
Height
73 - 75 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel, Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
|
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|