Compare performance (355 HP vs 219 HP), trunk space and price (74,800 $ vs 34,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mazda CX-50 Hybrid?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,000 $ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 74,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 40,830 $.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers visibly more power – delivering 355 HP compared to 219 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 414 lb-ft compared to 163 lb-ft. That’s about 251 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is clearly lighter – 4,008 lbs compared to 5,798 lbs. The difference is around 1,790 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q8 e-tron represents the pinnacle of Audi's electric SUV offerings, seamlessly blending luxurious design with cutting-edge technology. This vehicle continues to amaze with its impressive driving dynamics and refined comfort, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a sophisticated yet environmentally conscious ride. With its modern interior and innovative features, the Q8 e-tron redefines what it means to drive an electric SUV by combining efficiency with the premium quality Audi is renowned for.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is a refined addition to Mazda's lineup, merging elegance with eco-conscious engineering. With its dynamic styling and spacious interior, the vehicle effortlessly balances performance and efficiency, catering to those who value both sustainability and driving pleasure. This hybrid model stands out by offering a smooth ride that maintains Mazda's reputation for crafting vehicles with a driver-focused experience.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
74,800 - 85,200 $
|
Price
34,000 - 40,100 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
-
|
FuelEconomy City
39 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
-
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
37 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
14.5 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
5,798 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,008 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
193 in.
|
Length
186.1 in.
|
|
Width
76.2 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
65 in.
|
Height
64 - 65 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
355 HP
|
Power HP
219 HP
|
|
Torque
414 lb-ft
|
Torque
163 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
-
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|