Compare performance (631 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (84,300 $ vs 30,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – BMW X7 or Mazda CX-50?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-50 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the BMW X7 costs 84,300 $ . That’s a price difference of around 54,000 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs moderately better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 20 mpg for the BMW X7. That’s a difference of about 5 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X7 offers substantially more power – delivering 631 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 404 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X7 delivers substantially more torque with 590 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 280 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: BMW X7 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is substantially lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 5,417 lbs. The difference is around 1,676 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X7 is a rolling penthouse with a sports streak, serving up plush comfort, quiet confidence, and just enough attitude to make the school run feel like a red-carpet arrival. It blends creamy ride quality with crisp handling and a tech-laden cabin, all wrapped in a bold face that politely announces you’ve arrived—long before you actually do.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
84,300 - 152,400 $
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 20 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
20 - 24 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
21.9 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
5,417 - 5,986 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
203.6 - 203.9 in.
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
|
Width
78.7 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
70 - 72 in.
|
Height
63 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
375 - 631 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
398 - 590 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3 - 4.4 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mazda
|