VS

Mazda CX-50 vs Ford Ranger - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (227 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (30,300 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-50 or Ford Ranger?

Mazda CX-50 vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Mazda CX-50

  • only slightly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • somewhat lighter

Ford Ranger

  • clearly more power

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-50

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-50 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the Ford Ranger costs 32,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 2,520 $.

When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs a bit better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 21 mpg for the Ford Ranger. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 178 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers noticeably more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 120 lb-ft more.

CX-50

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is somewhat lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 4,203 lbs. The difference is around 462 lbs.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from $32,800
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Gasoline
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear Wheel, All Wheel
  • Power HP : 270 - 405 HP
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-50
Toyota Camry
VS
Mazda’s CX-50 brings rugged SUV stance, eager steering, and real cargo/ground clearance, while the Toyota Camry counters with sedan smarts: a calmer ride, stellar reliability, and hybrid mpg that laughs at gas stations. If your weekends involve trailheads and roof racks, go CX-50; if your calendar …
GMC Terrain
Ford Ranger
VS
The GMC Terrain plays the polished suburban hero with a cushy ride, easy tech, and solid mpg, while the Ford Ranger shows up in work boots with stout towing, bed utility, and genuine off-road chops. If your life is more Costco runs than cargo runs, pick the Terrain; if you measure weekends in …
Mazda CX-50
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

General
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.

details
mazda_cx-50_zs_act_1
mazda_cx-50_zs_det_1
mazda-cx-50_int_front-seats_01

Reviews Mazda CX-50

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-50
Volvo V60 Cross Country
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-50 or the Volvo V60 Cross Country is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
Nissan Murano
VS
The Ford Ranger and Nissan Murano compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Hyundai Sonata
Mazda CX-50
VS
Unsure whether the Hyundai Sonata or the Mazda CX-50 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-50
Nissan Sentra
VS
Mazda CX-50 and Nissan Sentra go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-50
Tesla Model 3
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-50 or the Tesla Model 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-50
Toyota Prius
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-50 or the Toyota Prius is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi A4 allroad
Mazda CX-50
VS
The Audi A4 allroad and Mazda CX-50 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan Rogue
Ford Ranger
VS
The Nissan Rogue and Ford Ranger compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-50
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SuperCrew
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
-
Length
185.8 in.
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
Width
75.6 in.
Width
79 in.
Height
63 in.
Height
73 - 75 in.

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Gasoline
Engine Type
Gasoline
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Drive Type
All Wheel
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
Gears
-
Gears
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ford
What is the starting MSRP for the Mazda CX-50?

Base pricing begins at 30,300 $.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. Prices shown are manufacturer suggested retail prices (MSRP). Taxes, registration fees and dealer charges are not included.