Compare performance (227 HP vs 201 HP), trunk space and price (25,000 $ vs 29,200 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Rogue?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is moderately cheaper – starting at 25,000 $ , while the Nissan Rogue costs 29,200 $ . That’s a price difference of around 4,235 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Nissan Rogue performs a bit better – achieving 30 mpg, compared to 26 mpg for the Mazda CX-30. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 201 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers clearly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 225 lb-ft. That’s about 85 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is only slightly lighter – 3,419 lbs compared to 3,477 lbs. The difference is around 58 lbs.
The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 brings big-car polish to a compact footprint, with taut handling and a cabin that feels a cut above most rivals. It’s not the boxiest hauler, but if you like crisp steering, tasteful design, and a dash of driver fun, this crossover makes the daily commute feel a little special.
detailsThe Nissan Rogue stands out in the crowded compact SUV market with its stylish design and comfort-driven interior. It offers a smooth driving experience with a focus on efficiency and modern driver assistance features. Inside, the ample cargo space and innovative tech features make it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
Price
29,200 - 40,900 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
22 - 26 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
27 - 30 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
30 - 33 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
32 - 37 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
14.5 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,419 - 3,527 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,477 - 3,737 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
173 in.
|
Length
183 in.
|
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
Width
72.4 in.
|
|
Height
61 - 62 in.
|
Height
66 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
201 HP
|
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
225 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
1.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|