Compare performance (227 HP vs 137 HP), trunk space and price (30,300 $ vs 20,500 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-50 or Chevrolet Trax?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Chevrolet Trax is significantly cheaper – starting at 20,500 $ , while the Mazda CX-50 costs 30,300 $ . That’s a price difference of around 9,800 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Chevrolet Trax performs slightly better – achieving 28 mpg, compared to 25 mpg for the Mazda CX-50. That’s a difference of about 3 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-50 offers markedly more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 137 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-50 delivers significantly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 162 lb-ft. That’s about 148 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The Mazda CX-50 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsThe Chevrolet Trax is a compact SUV that combines sleek styling with versatile performance, catering to urban drivers looking for a vehicle that navigates tightly packed streets with ease. With its comfortable interior, the Trax provides ample passenger space and practical features that appeal to small families and individuals alike. Its elevated driving position and crisp, dynamic handling offer a confident experience whether cruising through city traffic or taking on winding backroads.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
Price
20,500 - 24,500 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
28 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
32 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
13.2 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
Length
178.6 in.
|
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
Width
71.8 in.
|
|
Height
63 in.
|
Height
61 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel
|
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
137 HP
|
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
162 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
-
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Chevrolet
|