Compare performance (227 HP vs 450 HP), trunk space and price (30,300 $ vs 37,500 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-50 or Ford F-150?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-50 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the Ford F-150 costs 37,500 $ . That’s a price difference of around 7,150 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs somewhat better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 20 mpg for the Ford F-150. That’s a difference of about 5 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford F-150 offers substantially more power – delivering 450 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 223 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford F-150 delivers visibly more torque with 510 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 200 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford F-150 offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is a bit lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 4,391 lbs. The difference is around 650 lbs.
The Ford F-150 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsThe Ford F-150 is the quintessential American pickup, blending brawny style, smart tech, and the sort of cabin comfort that makes long hauls feel like short errands. Whether you’re towing toys or tackling a muddy jobsite, it shrugs off hard work with easygoing confidence—and still cleans up nicely for a night out.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
Price
37,500 - 79,000 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
15 - 20 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 26 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
23 - 36 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,391 - 5,863 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
Length
209.1 - 243.5 in.
|
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
Width
79.8 - 79.9 in.
|
|
Height
63 in.
|
Height
75 - 79 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
325 - 450 HP
|
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
400 - 510 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.7 - 5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|