Compare performance (227 HP vs 310 HP), trunk space and price (30,300 $ vs 32,100 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-50 or Nissan Frontier?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-50 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the Nissan Frontier costs 32,100 $ . That’s a price difference of around 1,750 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs markedly better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 18 mpg for the Nissan Frontier. That’s a difference of about 7 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Frontier offers noticeably more power – delivering 310 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-50 delivers very slightly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 281 lb-ft. That’s about 29 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The Nissan Frontier has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsThe Nissan Frontier is the no-nonsense midsize pickup that doubles as a weekday workhorse and a weekend adventure buddy, with just enough modern polish to keep your commute civilized. Against glossier rivals, it wins you over with straightforward capability, tough-guy charm, and the kind of dependability that doesn’t need to shout about it.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
Price
32,100 - 45,600 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
18 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
22 - 24 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
21.1 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
King Cab, Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
Length
210.2 - 224.1 in.
|
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
Width
73 - 74.7 in.
|
|
Height
63 in.
|
Height
71 - 72 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
310 HP
|
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
281 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
3.8 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|