Compare performance (355 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (51,200 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Acura MDX or Ford Ranger?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Ranger is significantly cheaper – starting at 32,800 $ , while the Acura MDX costs 51,200 $ . That’s a price difference of around 18,380 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Ford Ranger performs barely better – achieving 21 mpg, compared to 19 mpg for the Acura MDX. That’s a difference of about 2 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers slightly more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 355 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers moderately more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 354 lb-ft. That’s about 76 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Acura MDX offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Ranger is very slightly lighter – 4,203 lbs compared to 4,268 lbs. The difference is around 65 lbs.
The Ford Ranger stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Acura MDX blends upscale comfort with a surprisingly playful chassis, making school runs feel like detours you actually want to take. Tech and cabin quality punch above the badge, while the confident styling tells the neighbors you’ve graduated from minivan life without going full luxury-brand showoff.
detailsThe Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51,200 - 75,300 $
|
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
17 - 19 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
21 - 26 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SH-AWD, SUV
|
Body Type
SuperCrew
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,268 - 4,776 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
198.4 in.
|
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
|
|
Width
78.7 in.
|
Width
79 in.
|
|
Height
67 in.
|
Height
73 - 75 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel, Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
290 - 355 HP
|
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
|
|
Torque
267 - 354 lb-ft
|
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3 - 3.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
Brand
Acura
|
Brand
Ford
|