Compare performance (349 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (57,900 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Audi S5 Sportback or Ford Ranger?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Ranger is significantly cheaper – starting at 32,800 $ , while the Audi S5 Sportback costs 57,900 $ . That’s a price difference of around 25,080 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Ford Ranger performs very slightly better – achieving 21 mpg, compared to 20 mpg for the Audi S5 Sportback. That’s a difference of about 1 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers somewhat more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 349 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers a bit more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 369 lb-ft. That’s about 61 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi S5 Sportback is only slightly lighter – 3,924 lbs compared to 4,203 lbs. The difference is around 279 lbs.
The Ford Ranger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi S5 Sportback is a stunning blend of performance and practicality, offering an exhilarating driving experience while maintaining the convenience of a five-door layout. Its sleek, aerodynamic design is complemented by a luxurious interior that exudes sophistication and technology. With precise handling and a powerful engine under the hood, this model redefines the sports sedan, making it a preferred choice for those who desire both speed and everyday usability.
detailsThe Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57,900 - 64,500 $
|
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
20 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.3 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SuperCrew
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,924 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
187.2 in.
|
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
|
|
Width
72.6 in.
|
Width
79 in.
|
|
Height
54 in.
|
Height
73 - 75 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
349 HP
|
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
|
|
Torque
369 lb-ft
|
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|