Compare performance (349 HP vs 405 HP), trunk space and price (58,400 $ vs 32,800 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Audi SQ5 or Ford Ranger?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Ranger is substantially cheaper – starting at 32,800 $ , while the Audi SQ5 costs 58,400 $ . That’s a price difference of around 25,580 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Ford Ranger performs very slightly better – achieving 21 mpg, compared to 19 mpg for the Audi SQ5. That’s a difference of about 2 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers a bit more power – delivering 405 HP compared to 349 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers somewhat more torque with 430 lb-ft compared to 369 lb-ft. That’s about 61 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Ranger is very slightly lighter – 4,203 lbs compared to 4,288 lbs. The difference is around 85 lbs.
The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi SQ5 blends everyday practicality with a surprisingly playful attitude, serving up punchy power, a growly soundtrack, and quattro grip that shrugs off bad weather. Inside, it wraps you in understated luxury and slick tech, while the sport-tuned chassis keeps it composed on twisty backroads without punishing you on the commute.
details
The Ford Ranger blends work-truck grit with weekday polish, shrugging off muddy trails and construction sites while still feeling tidy around town. Inside, it’s surprisingly refined with intuitive tech and clever storage, making it as easy to live with as it is tough to beat for adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
58,400 - 66,500 $
|
Price
32,800 - 55,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
19 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
16 - 21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
24 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 25 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
18 - 20.3 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SuperCrew
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,288 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,203 - 5,325 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
184.3 in.
|
Length
210.6 - 210.9 in.
|
|
Width
74.5 in.
|
Width
79 in.
|
|
Height
65 in.
|
Height
73 - 75 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
349 HP
|
Power HP
270 - 405 HP
|
|
Torque
369 lb-ft
|
Torque
310 - 430 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|