Compare performance (500 HP vs 280 HP), trunk space and price (31,900 $ vs 40,200 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Ford Mustang or Honda Ridgeline?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Mustang is noticeably cheaper – starting at 31,900 $ , while the Honda Ridgeline costs 40,200 $ . That’s a price difference of around 8,230 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Ford Mustang performs somewhat better – achieving 21 mpg, compared to 18 mpg for the Honda Ridgeline. That’s a difference of about 3 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang offers clearly more power – delivering 500 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 220 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang delivers markedly more torque with 418 lb-ft compared to 262 lb-ft. That’s about 156 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Honda Ridgeline offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang is clearly lighter – 3,579 lbs compared to 4,420 lbs. The difference is around 841 lbs.
The Ford Mustang is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Mustang is an iconic American muscle car known for its powerful performance and sleek design. Since its debut in the mid-1960s, the Mustang has captured the hearts of car enthusiasts with its combination of bold styling and thrilling driving dynamics. With its enduring presence on the roads, this legendary vehicle continues to embody the spirit of freedom and adventure.
detailsThe Honda Ridgeline blends the comfort and refinement of a family SUV with the utility of a pickup, making everyday chores feel easy and weekend adventures a breeze. It won’t out-brag the heavy-duty crowd, but its clever bed tricks, smooth ride, and smart cabin make it the choice for buyers who want truck capability without the truck drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,900 - 63,100 $
|
Price
40,200 - 46,800 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
14 - 21 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
18 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
22 - 32 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
23 - 24 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
16 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
19.5 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback, Convertible
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,579 - 3,933 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,420 - 4,504 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
10.3 - 13.3 cu. ft.
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
189.4 - 189.7 in.
|
Length
210.2 in.
|
|
Width
75.4 - 76.1 in.
|
Width
78.6 in.
|
|
Height
54 - 55 in.
|
Height
70 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic,
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
315 - 500 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Torque
350 - 418 lb-ft
|
Torque
262 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.3 - 5 L
|
Engine Displacement
3.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|