Compare performance (285 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (40,200 $ vs 30,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Honda Pilot or Mazda CX-50?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-50 is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the Honda Pilot costs 40,200 $ . That’s a price difference of around 9,900 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs noticeably better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 19 mpg for the Honda Pilot. That’s a difference of about 6 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda Pilot offers noticeably more power – delivering 285 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-50 delivers slightly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 262 lb-ft. That’s about 48 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Honda Pilot offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is slightly lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 4,306 lbs. The difference is around 565 lbs.
The Honda Pilot sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda Pilot is a big-hearted family SUV that blends relaxed road manners with clever storage and a cabin that makes carpool chaos oddly satisfying. It won’t turn heads like a luxury diva, but with confident traction, comfy seats for the whole crew, and a reputation for going the distance, the Pilot is an easy, low-stress buy for busy households.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,200 - 54,600 $
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
18 - 19 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
23 - 27 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7 - 8
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,306 - 4,685 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
199.9 - 200.2 in.
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
|
Width
78.5 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
70 - 72 in.
|
Height
63 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel, Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
285 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
262 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|