Compare performance (139 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (27,000 $ vs 30,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Kia Niro or Mazda CX-50?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Kia Niro is slightly cheaper – starting at 27,000 $ , while the Mazda CX-50 costs 30,300 $ . That’s a price difference of around 3,310 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Kia Niro performs significantly better – achieving 53 mpg, compared to 25 mpg for the Mazda CX-50. That’s a difference of about 28 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-50 offers markedly more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 139 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-50 delivers markedly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 195 lb-ft. That’s about 115 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is markedly lighter – 3,071 lbs compared to 3,741 lbs. The difference is around 670 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro stands out in the hybrid and electric vehicle segment with its stylish design and versatile functionality. With an emphasis on eco-friendly technology, it offers a smooth and quiet driving experience that complements its impressive efficiency. Inside, the Niro provides a spacious and comfortable cabin, featuring user-friendly technology and ample cargo space, making it an ideal choice for both urban commuting and long road trips.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 35,400 $
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
53 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
45 - 54 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
11.1 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,071 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
174 in.
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
|
Width
71.9 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
60 in.
|
Height
63 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
139 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
195 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
1.6 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|