Compare performance (227 HP vs 149 HP), trunk space and price (25,000 $ vs 21,600 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Sentra?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Sentra is a bit cheaper – starting at 21,600 $ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,000 $ . That’s a price difference of around 3,405 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Nissan Sentra performs moderately better – achieving 30 mpg, compared to 26 mpg for the Mazda CX-30. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 227 HP compared to 149 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers clearly more torque with 310 lb-ft compared to 146 lb-ft. That’s about 164 lb-ft more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Sentra is slightly lighter – 3,036 lbs compared to 3,419 lbs. The difference is around 383 lbs.
The Mazda CX-30 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 brings big-car polish to a compact footprint, with taut handling and a cabin that feels a cut above most rivals. It’s not the boxiest hauler, but if you like crisp steering, tasteful design, and a dash of driver fun, this crossover makes the daily commute feel a little special.
detailsThe Nissan Sentra has long been a staple in the compact car segment, offering a blend of reliability and modern design. Known for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the Sentra provides a comfortable ride for daily commutes. It continues to attract those who value practicality without sacrificing style.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 37,000 $
|
Price
21,600 - 24,600 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
22 - 26 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
30 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
30 - 33 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
38 - 40 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.7 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
12.4 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,419 - 3,527 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,036 - 3,084 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
14.3 cu. ft.
|
|
Length
173 in.
|
Length
182.9 in.
|
|
Width
70.7 in.
|
Width
71.5 in.
|
|
Height
61 - 62 in.
|
Height
56 - 57 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Front Wheel
|
|
Power HP
191 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
149 HP
|
|
Torque
186 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
146 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|