Compare performance (340 HP vs 450 HP), trunk space and price (37,800 $ vs 37,500 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-90 or Ford F-150?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford F-150 is barely cheaper – starting at 37,500 $ , while the Mazda CX-90 costs 37,800 $ . That’s a price difference of around 395 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-90 performs somewhat better – achieving 24 mpg, compared to 20 mpg for the Ford F-150. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford F-150 offers noticeably more power – delivering 450 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 110 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford F-150 delivers noticeably more torque with 510 lb-ft compared to 369 lb-ft. That’s about 141 lb-ft more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-90 offers more seats – 8 vs 6.
In terms of curb weight, Ford F-150 is barely lighter – 4,391 lbs compared to 4,735 lbs. The difference is around 344 lbs.
The Ford F-150 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-90 brings sports-sedan swagger to the family SUV crowd, pairing a poised chassis with a hushed, upscale cabin that feels genuinely premium. It’s roomy, refined, and surprisingly fun to steer, making it a savvy alternative to the usual luxury suspects—just know the ride leans firm in exchange for that grin-inducing composure.
details
The Ford F-150 is the quintessential American pickup, blending brawny style, smart tech, and the sort of cabin comfort that makes long hauls feel like short errands. Whether you’re towing toys or tackling a muddy jobsite, it shrugs off hard work with easygoing confidence—and still cleans up nicely for a night out.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,800 - 56,500 $
|
Price
37,500 - 79,000 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 24 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
15 - 20 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
28 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
18 - 26 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
18.5 - 19.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
23 - 36 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
6 - 8
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,735 - 4,901 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,391 - 5,863 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
201.6 in.
|
Length
209.1 - 243.5 in.
|
|
Width
77.6 in.
|
Width
79.8 - 79.9 in.
|
|
Height
68 in.
|
Height
75 - 79 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
Rear Wheel, All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
280 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
325 - 450 HP
|
|
Torque
332 - 369 lb-ft
|
Torque
400 - 510 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
3.3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.7 - 5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|