Compare performance (394 HP vs 227 HP), trunk space and price (61,500 $ vs 30,300 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Land Rover Range Rover Velar or Mazda CX-50?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-50 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61,500 $ . That’s a price difference of around 31,200 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs slightly better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 22 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. That’s a difference of about 3 mpg.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers clearly more power – delivering 394 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 167 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers noticeably more torque with 406 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 96 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is somewhat lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 4,130 lbs. The difference is around 389 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a statement of modern luxury and progressive sophistication in the SUV segment. With its sleek design and refined aesthetics, the Velar seamlessly merges innovative technology with a sense of timeless elegance. Inside, it offers a sanctuary of comfort and cutting-edge infotainment, making every journey an opulent experience.
detailsThe Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
61,500 - 78,400 $
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
19 - 22 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
15 - 26 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
21.6 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
4,130 - 4,430 lbs
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
188.9 in.
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
|
Width
80.4 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
66 in.
|
Height
63 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline,
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
247 - 394 HP
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
|
Torque
269 - 406 lb-ft
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2 - 3 L
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Mazda
|