Compare performance (227 HP vs 393 HP), trunk space and price (30,300 $ vs 50,000 $ ) at a glance. See which model fits your needs and budget better – Mazda CX-50 or BMW X3?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-50 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,300 $ , while the BMW X3 costs 50,000 $ . That’s a price difference of around 19,650 $.
When it comes to city fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 performs slightly better – achieving 25 mpg, compared to 21 mpg for the BMW X3. That’s a difference of about 4 mpg.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers clearly more power – delivering 393 HP compared to 227 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers noticeably more torque with 428 lb-ft compared to 310 lb-ft. That’s about 118 lb-ft more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-50 is moderately lighter – 3,741 lbs compared to 4,176 lbs. The difference is around 435 lbs.
The Mazda CX-50 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-50 wraps an outdoorsy, adventure-leaning look around the brand’s trademark fun-to-drive chassis, delivering crossover practicality with a dash of trail cred. Inside it feels more premium than you’d expect, though the ride skews taut and the dial-first infotainment may split opinions, so test it on your commute and your favorite back road.
detailsThe BMW X3 blends real-world practicality with that familiar Bavarian poise, turning everyday errands into a small celebration of good steering. Inside, it feels classy without shouting, and the ride has the calm confidence that makes you invent detours just to keep driving.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,300 - 43,300 $
|
Price
50,000 - 64,700 $
|
|
FuelEconomy City
23 - 25 mpg
|
FuelEconomy City
21 mpg
|
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
29 - 31 MPG
|
FuelEconomy Hwy
26 - 28 MPG
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
15.9 gal
|
Fuel tank capacity
17.2 gal
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
3,741 - 3,915 lbs
|
Curb weight
4,176 - 4,535 lbs
|
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
Trunk Volume
-
|
|
Length
185.8 in.
|
Length
187.2 in.
|
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
Width
75.6 in.
|
|
Height
63 in.
|
Height
65 in.
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Gasoline
|
Engine Type
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
Drive Type
All Wheel
|
|
Power HP
187 - 227 HP
|
Power HP
255 - 393 HP
|
|
Torque
185 - 310 lb-ft
|
Torque
295 - 428 lb-ft
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Engine Displacement
2.5 L
|
Engine Displacement
2 - 3 L
|
|
Gears
-
|
Gears
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BMW
|